7 months ago
41 ARTICLE AD
The research focuses more on Coinbase as a potential risk factor due to its existing custodial role and potential to gain significant control through ETFs.
Spot Ethereum exchange-traded funds (ETFs), if approved, could intensify validator concentration risks within the Ethereum network, according to recent research from S&P Global.
The research, titled “U.S. Ether ETFs Could Exacerbate Concentration Risk,” sheds light on the potential impact of spot Ethereum funds on validator concentration on the Ethereum network, particularly those that incorporate staking.
“An increase in ether staking ETFs could affect the mix of validators participating in the Ethereum network’s consensus mechanism. The participation of institutional custodians could reduce the current concentration on the Lido decentralized staking protocol. However, it may also introduce new concentration risk, particularly if a single entity is chosen to stake the bulk of ether included in these ETFs,” stated the analysis.
Traditional spot Bitcoin ETFs secure their holdings in digital vaults, with their primary function being to mirror the asset’s market price. However, Ethereum’s unique proposition lies in staking – where crypto is locked up to support network operations and secure transactions, rewarding participants in the process. Despite potential rewards, staking introduces the risk of ‘slashing’ if validators underperform or act maliciously.
According to the research, simple spot Ethereum ETFs won’t affect the validator mix, but the proposing staking-enabled Ethereum ETFs, such as those of Ark Invest and Franklin Templeton, could become large enough to significantly influence validator concentration.
“Spot ether ETFs that simply hold ether will not affect the validator mix in Ethereum’s consensus mechanism. Spot ether ETFs that include staking, however, will do exactly that–at least if inflows are high enough.” added the analysis. “U.S. spot ether ETFs that incorporate staking could become large enough to change validator concentrations in the Ethereum network, for better or worse.”
S&P Global’s analysis also highlights specific concerns around Lido and Coinbase. Both entities are potential threats to validator concentration but for slightly different reasons.
The research notes that while Lido holds nearly 33% of staked ETH, it’s unlikely that US institutions launching Ethereum staking ETFs will directly engage with Lido due to regulatory and risk considerations. Instead, these ETFs might opt for regulated digital asset custodians for staking, potentially mitigating Lido’s dominance. However, this shift raises concerns about the role of Coinbase.
The research warns that Coinbase, a major exchange with significant validator control, could increase its Ethereum stake through ETFs, leading to greater concentration. Furthermore, Coinbase’s dual role as custodian for multiple Bitcoin ETFs and potential involvement in Ethereum ETFs could exacerbate concentration.
However, the overall impact of ETFs on concentration depends on their staking practices. Research suggests that the introduction of new digital asset custodians could allow ETF issuers to diversify their stakes across different entities, potentially mitigating concentration risk.
The information on or accessed through this website is obtained from independent sources we believe to be accurate and reliable, but Decentral Media, Inc. makes no representation or warranty as to the timeliness, completeness, or accuracy of any information on or accessed through this website. Decentral Media, Inc. is not an investment advisor. We do not give personalized investment advice or other financial advice. The information on this website is subject to change without notice. Some or all of the information on this website may become outdated, or it may be or become incomplete or inaccurate. We may, but are not obligated to, update any outdated, incomplete, or inaccurate information.
You should never make an investment decision on an ICO, IEO, or other investment based on the information on this website, and you should never interpret or otherwise rely on any of the information on this website as investment advice. We strongly recommend that you consult a licensed investment advisor or other qualified financial professional if you are seeking investment advice on an ICO, IEO, or other investment. We do not accept compensation in any form for analyzing or reporting on any ICO, IEO, cryptocurrency, currency, tokenized sales, securities, or commodities.
