2 hours ago
2 ARTICLE AD
The SEC asserts that XRP should be regulated as a security, regardless of who bought it or how they paid for it.
Key Takeaways
The SEC filed a brief appealing a court ruling that found XRP was not a security when sold to retail investors. The SEC seeks to overturn the district court's ruling and classify all XRP sales as unregistered securities offerings. <?xml encoding="UTF-8"?>The SEC on Wednesday filed an opening brief in its efforts to get the US Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit to overturn a previous court ruling that found XRP was not classified as a security when sold to retail investors.
In a July 2023 ruling, Judge Analisa Torres of the US District Court distinguished between XRP sales, determining that those on exchanges were not securities, but sales to institutional investors were.
Following the court’s July ruling, a final judgment last August ordered Ripple to pay a $125 million civil penalty for institutional sales of XRP.
The SEC later decided to proceed with an appeal, aiming to challenge the court’s ruling that secondary market sales of XRP tokens were non-securities.
In the brief shared by defense lawyer James Filan, the SEC contends that both institutional and retail XRP sales meet the criteria for investment contracts under the Howey test. The regulator reiterated that Ripple’s sales of XRP, totaling over $2 billion, were unregistered investment contracts and violated federal securities laws.
The appeal challenges the district court’s distinction between institutional and retail investors. The SEC argues that Ripple’s marketing efforts targeted both groups, which means that all buyers had a reasonable expectation of profit based on Ripple’s efforts, satisfying the Howey test.
“All XRP investors — not just institutional investors who purchased XRP knowingly from Ripple — reasonably expected profits from Ripple’s efforts to increase the price of XRP,” the brief states.
The SEC also disputes the district court’s finding that Ripple’s transactions involving non-cash consideration do not qualify as investment contracts. The appeal argues these transactions satisfy the “investment of money” requirement.
The regulator seeks to reverse the district court’s final judgment that favored Ripple and establish that all XRP sales qualify as unregistered securities offerings.
If successful, the case would return to the district court. There, a judge would decide what further actions to take against Ripple and whether its top executives helped break securities laws when XRP was sold to investors. The SEC also aims for “additional remedies,” which could include increased penalties.
Disclaimer
