ARTICLE AD
Rebel Wilson’s hopes to squelch The Deb producers’ defamation lawsuit against her have been stymied by a Los Angeles judge.
“Because the Court finds that the statements are not protected activities subject to an anti-SLAPP motion, the Court does not proceed to the second prong of the analysis for the Plaintiffs’ likelihood of prevailing on the merits,” ruled LA Superior Court Judge Thomas D. Long last night, confirming his tentative of earlier on November 21. “Accordingly, the anti-SLAPP motion is hereby Denied.”
The ruling comes after a long-ish hearing in downtown LA on Thursday where dueling lawyers for Amanda Ghost, Gregor Cameron and Vince Holden went head-to-head with attorney for the Pitch Perfect star over Wilson’s claims of “vile and disgusting behavior” earlier this year against the producers.
In an Instagram video, Wilson slammed the trio for allegedly embezzling cash from the musical comedy, threatening to close the movie down, as well as engaging in sexual harassment of one of its lead actors. No stranger to a public dust-up or two (just ask Sacha Baron Cohen or Australian authorities over Deb writing credits), Wilson made the allegations against Ghost, Cameron and Holden back in July when it looked like The Deb was going to lose a premiere perch at the Toronto International Film Festival.
Depicting Wilson as “spreading vicious lies without regard for the irreparable damage her reckless words would cause on the hard-earned personal and professional reputations of Plaintiffs,” the trio of producers sued The Deb director and actor on July 12. They also put out a statement from Deb actress Charlotte MacInnes exclaiming that no sexual harassment occurred between her and Ghost, contrary to Wilson’s claims.
Taking to social media again, Wilson declared online on July 31 that she was telling “the truth about these absolute f*ckwits.” She followed that up more formally with a counter-complaint of her own on September 26, just after The Deb screened after all at TIFF.
Which brings us to this week, and Wilson’s failure to convince the judge that her remarks about the producers was in “the public’s interest” and hence protected by “the constitutional right of free speech in connection with a public issue.”
Outside the court, the implication of this ruling keeps The Deb from being seen by almost anyone since its debut on the closing night of this year’s TIFF. Even with Wilson’s agency WME trying to sell the picture and financier Len Blavatnik having put millions into the movie. no one will likely touch The Deb until the legal battle is over.
Which, with Wilson set to appeal, could be a while.
“We are very gratified by the Court’s ruling. Defendant Rebel Wilson’s anti-SLAPP motion was a cynical attempt to stifle a valid legal claim after she launched a public attack against three hardworking professionals,” the producer’s main attorney Camille Vasquez. “We are grateful to the court for reaching the correct legal result and allowing that claim to proceed. We look forward to seeing Ms. Wilson in court.”
On more court face-offs to come, both sides agree.
“No California court has ever ruled that a demand letter sent by a celebrity in anticipation of litigation is not, or ceases to be, ‘a matter of public interest’ simply because the receiving party later shared it with the media as part of the receiving party’s Reply papers,” Wilson’s primary lawyer Bryan Freedman told Deadline today.
“The act of sending the demand letter in anticipation of litigation, which was subsequently published during the litigation, inherently establishes its connection to litigation and thus a clear matter of public interest,” the attorney, who participated in Thursday’s DTLA hearing added. “We are more than confident the appellate court will correct this error but disappointed that The Deb will continued to be affected by this nonsense.”
Which means there’ll be more of this Deb dispute debuting in the courts for months to come.